Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Peer Review: What is the history of peer review?

Benos, Dale J., et al. “The Ups and Downs of Peer Review.” Advances in Physiology Education, vol. 31, no. 2, June 2007, pp. 145-52. doi:10.1152/advan.00104.2006.

Burnham, John C. "The Evolution of Editorial Peer Review." JAMA, vol. 263, no. 10, 9 Mar. 1990, pp. 1323-29, doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440100023003.

Gould, Thomas H. P. Do We Still Need Peer Review? An Argument for Change. Scarecrow Press, 2013.

Kronick, David A. "Peer Review in 18th-Century Scientific Journalism." JAMA, vol. 263, no. 10, 9 Mar. 1990, pp. 1321-22. doi:10.1001/jama.1990.03440100021002.

Rennie, Drummond. "Editorial Peer Review: Its Development and Rationale." Peer Review in Health Sciences, edited by Fiona Godlee and Tom Jefferson, BMJ Books, 1999, pp. 1-13. citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.170.2467&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Spier, Ray. "The History of the Peer-Review Process." Trends in Biotechnology, vol. 20, no. 8, Aug. 2002, pp. 357-58, doi:10.1016/S0167-7799(02)01985-6.